# Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. Cooper

> Court of Appeals of Texas · December 21, 1921 · 236 S.W. 811

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3950841

## Case

- **Full name:** QUANAH, A. & P. RY. CO. v. COOPER Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** December 21, 1921
- **Citations:** 236 S.W. 811; 1921 Tex. App. LEXIS 1318
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Hall
- **Judges:** Boyce, Hall, Haul
- **Cited by:** 7 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3950841

## Opinion text

HALL, J.
I dissent, for the further reason that the evidence was admitted for the purpose of explaining an ambiguity, if any, without sufficient pleadings to admit it. Morgan v. Turner, 4 Tex. Civ. App. 192 , 23 S. W. 287 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3950841. Public record. Not legal advice.