# Childress v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 3, 1922 · 92 Tex. Crim. 215

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3949924

## Case

- **Full name:** Max Childress v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** May 3, 1922
- **Citations:** 92 Tex. Crim. 215; 241 S.W. 1029; 1922 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 403
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Hawkins
- **Judges:** Hawkins
- **Cited by:** 52 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3949924

## Opinion text

HAWKINS, Judge.
— Conviction is for felony theft, punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
Our Assistant Attorney General calls attention to the fact that none of the bills of exception appear from the record to have been filed in the lower court. They are approved by the trial judge, but without the record shows the filing in the court below they cannot be considered. Oliver v. State, 58 Texas Crim. Rep., 50 , 124 S. W. Rep., 637 .
We have examined the statement of facts, and find the evidence sufficient to support the' verdict. It being purely a fact case as the record now appears we deem it unnecessary to set out the evidence.
The judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3949924. Public record. Not legal advice.