# Reeves v. Fuqua

> Court of Appeals of Texas · October 28, 1925 · 277 S.W. 418

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3947457

## Case

- **Full name:** REEVES Et Al. v. FUQUA Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** October 28, 1925
- **Citations:** 277 S.W. 418
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum by Randolph
- **Judges:** Randolph, Jackson
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3947457

## Opinion text

On Motion for Rehearing.
RANDOLPH, J.
We have concluded that we erred in holding that limitation had run. against the claim of Thelma Boswell and Sim Revees. The proof of their ages was not shown by any pleading, and was only shown by the recitals in an exhibit attached to plaintiffs’ petition and pleaded for an entirely different purpose, and upon an entirely different issue. Freiberg v. Magale, 70 Tex. 118 , 7 S. W. 684 ; Burks v. Watson, 48 Tex. 107, 115 .
For this reason we withdraw that portion of our opinion and holding, and, as the other holdings sustain the action of the trial c'ourt in dismissing the case, we overrule the appellants’ motion for rehearing.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3947457. Public record. Not legal advice.