# Wright v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · December 3, 1930 · 116 Tex. Crim. 355

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3946027

## Case

- **Full name:** R. L. Wright v. State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** December 3, 1930
- **Citations:** 116 Tex. Crim. 355; 34 S.W.2d 598; 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 771
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum
- **Judges:** HAWKINS, JUDGE. —
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3946027

## Opinion text

Appellant's motion for rehearing is apparently predicated upon the assumption that an indictment charging the transportation of intoxicating liquor is not good unless it is averred that such transportation is for the purpose of sale. This is not the law. See Crowley v. State, 92 Tex.Crim. R., 242 S.W. 472 ; Harrison v. State, 95 Tex.Crim. R., 254 S.W. 975 ; Turner v. State, 95 Tex.Crim. R., 255 S.W. 439 ; Harper v. State, 257 S.W. 1102 ; Bailey v. State, 97 Tex.Crim. R., 260 S.W. 1057 ; Gandy v. State, 99 Tex.Crim. R., 268 S.W. 951 ; Brown v. State, 101 Tex.Crim. R., 276 S.W. 438 .
The motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled. *Page 357

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3946027. Public record. Not legal advice.