# Brown v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 22, 1935 · 129 Tex. Crim. 82

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3941968

## Case

- **Full name:** S. R. Brown v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** May 22, 1935
- **Citations:** 129 Tex. Crim. 82; 83 S.W.2d 678; 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 356
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum by Hawkins
- **Judges:** Hawkins, Krueger
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3941968

## Opinion text

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
HAWKINS, Judge.
Appellant requests a rehearing “For the reasons and upon the grounds as follows, to-wit: Appellant especially relies upon and invites the court’s careful consideration of the alleged errors one to six inclusive as set out in appellant’s brief, in this his motion for rehearing, and upon which he relies for a reversal of the court’s judgment in this case.” It will be observed that in no particular does appellant point out what he regards as erroneous in our opinion of af
*86
firmance. The motion is in substance only a request that we again review the questions originally presented in appellant’s brief. The motion is too general to command the attention of the court. Jordan v. State, 64 Texas Crim. Rep., 187 , 141 S. W., 786 ; Cooper v. State, 98 Texas Crim. Rep., 446 , 265 S. W., 894 ; Estep v. State, 107 Texas Crim. Rep., 538 , 298 S. W., 283 .
The motion for rehearing is overruled.
Overruled.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3941968. Public record. Not legal advice.