# Trinity Valdey & N. Ry. Co. v. Scholz

> Court of Appeals of Texas · February 14, 1919 · 209 S.W. 224

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3930164

## Case

- **Full name:** TRINITY VALDEY & N. RY. CO. Et Al. v. SCHOLZ Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** February 14, 1919
- **Citations:** 209 S.W. 224
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum by Hightower
- **Judges:** Walker, Hightower
- **Cited by:** 8 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3930164

## Opinion text

HIGHTOWER, C. J.
I concur in the opin-
ion reversing the judgment of the lower court because of the error of that court in refusing the submission of the special issud discussed. I am not certain, however, that .the facts as reflected by the record show any liability as against appellant railway company. But I am not sufficiently advised at this time to dissent from the view expressed on that point.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3930164. Public record. Not legal advice.