# Schintz v. Morris

> Court of Appeals of Texas · May 6, 1896 · 13 Tex. Civ. App. 580

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3916946

## Case

- **Full name:** H. v. Schintz v. F. G. Morris
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** May 6, 1896
- **Citations:** 13 Tex. Civ. App. 580; 35 S.W. 516
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence
- **Judges:** Collard, Fisher, Key
- **Cited by:** 24 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3916946

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- noting that a trial court’s decision to grant a motion for new trial, thereby setting aside the only judgment that was rendered on the verdict, had “the effect of destroying the life of the verdict for all purposes.”
- noting that a decision to grant a motion for new trial, thereby setting aside the only judgment that was rendered on the verdict, had "the effect of destroying the life of the verdict for all purposes."

## Opinion text

I fully concur in the foregoing opinion and decision of the question presented.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3916946. Public record. Not legal advice.