# Minter v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · April 16, 1913 · 70 Tex. Crim. 634

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3916891

## Case

- **Full name:** Jim Mister v. State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** April 16, 1913
- **Citations:** 70 Tex. Crim. 634; 159 S.W. 286
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** Davidson, Prendergast
- **Cited by:** 36 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3916891

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- stating that it is "the duly of eveiy peace officer to preserve the peace within his jurisdiction!;]” thus, relying on "suspicious places” statute, "he shall use all lawful means ... [to] interfere, without warrant, to prevent or suppress crime”
- stating that it is "the duty of every peace officer to preserve the peace within his jurisdiction]" thus, relying on "suspicious places" statute, "he shall use all lawful means ... [to] interfere, without warrant, to prevent or suppress crime"

## Opinion text

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
I respectfully dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3916891. Public record. Not legal advice.