# Scott v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · February 14, 1923 · 95 Tex. Crim. 82

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3911846

## Case

- **Full name:** H. T. Scott v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** February 14, 1923
- **Citations:** 95 Tex. Crim. 82; 252 S.W. 766; 1923 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 517
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum by Lattimore
- **Judges:** Hawkins, Lattimore, Morrow
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3911846

## Opinion text

ON REHEARING.
LATTIMORE, Judge.
— Upon practically an identical record in a companion case of Fields v. State, No. 6551, the majority of the court have concluded that no error was committed in the admission of evi
*88
dence of what is claimed to be other offenses, nor in the charge of the learned trial court in reference thereto. For our views in greater detail upon these questions, an expression of which here would be but a reiteration, see the opinion of the majority upon the original consideration and upon motion for rehearing in the case of Fields v. State, No. 6551, opinion this day handed down.
The motion for rehearing will be overruled.
Overruled.
ON REHEARING.
June 27, 1923.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3911846. Public record. Not legal advice.