# Holland v. Brown McFarland

> Court of Appeals of Texas · September 11, 1912 · 152 S.W. 1195

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3909843

## Case

- **Full name:** HOLLAND v. BROWN & McFARLAND
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** September 11, 1912
- **Citations:** 152 S.W. 1195; 1912 Tex. App. LEXIS 1378
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Hodges
- **Judges:** Hodges
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3909843

## Opinion text

HODGES, J.
This is a motion to affirm on certificate under the provisions of article 1016 of the Revised Civil Statutes of 1895. The certificate of the clerk shows that the appeal bond was filed in the court below on
*1196
January 29, 1912. The motion to affirm, together with the certificate of the clerk, was filed with the clerk of this court September 11, 1912. The appeal, which was perfected in the court helow, was returnable to the last term of this court, which expired on the first Monday in July. The motion to affirm therefore comes too late. The following authorities sufficiently state the grounds: Laughlin v. Dabney, 86 Tex. 120 , 24 S. W. 259 ; Western Union Tel. Co. v. Wofford, 32 Tex. Cr. R. 427 , 72 S. W. 620 , 74 S. W. 943 ; Pickett v. Mead, 25 S. W. 654 ; Berry v. Blankenship, 30 Tex. 380 .
The motion to affirm is refused.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3909843. Public record. Not legal advice.