# Sanger v. First Nat. Bank of Amarillo

> Court of Appeals of Texas · October 24, 1914 · 170 S.W. 1087

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3906193

## Case

- **Full name:** SANGER v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF AMARILLO Et Al.
- **Court:** Court of Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** October 24, 1914
- **Citations:** 170 S.W. 1087; 1914 Tex. App. LEXIS 1028
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum by Hall
- **Judges:** Hall, Hendricks
- **Cited by:** 21 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3906193

## Opinion text

Second Motion for Rehearing.
HALL, X
Appellees have filed a second motion for rehearing, in which one of their attorneys, W H. Kimbrough, confesses that he is responsible for -the irrelevant and impertinent matter which we criticized in our opinion disposing óf the first motion. Our criticism is therefore limited accordingly. On account of the irrelevant and impertinent matter contained in this motion, it is ordered stricken from the files.
HENDRICKS, X, not sitting.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3906193. Public record. Not legal advice.