# Latham v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · November 11, 1914 · 75 Tex. Crim. 575

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3904590

## Case

- **Full name:** Minnie Latham v. the State
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
- **Decided:** November 11, 1914
- **Citations:** 75 Tex. Crim. 575; 172 S.W. 797; 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 547
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Dayidsoh
- **Judges:** Davidsoe, Oast, Dayidsoh, Harpeb, Pbeedebgast, Davids
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3904590

## Opinion text

DAYIDSOH, Judge
(dissenting).—I dissent. There was error in regard to admitting in evidence of the erasure of the name on the hotel register, and in the bills in regard to the witnesses Bynum and Lockwood.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3904590. Public record. Not legal advice.