# Salley v. McCoy

> Supreme Court of South Carolina · December 9, 1936 · 182 S.C. 249

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3880939

## Case

- **Full name:** SALLEY v. McCOY ET AL.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of South Carolina
- **Decided:** December 9, 1936
- **Citations:** 182 S.C. 249; 189 S.E. 196; 1936 S.C. LEXIS 31
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bonham
- **Judges:** Stabler, Messrs, Bonham, Baker, Fisi-Iburne, Gaston, Eisi-Iburne
- **Cited by:** 34 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3880939

## Opinion text

Mr. Justice Bonham
(concurring) : I concur that this Court is bound by its decision in the case of
Holt v. Calhoun et al.,
175 S. C., 381, 179 S. E., 501 . With that case still of force, I am constrained by the opinion declared in it to concur in Mr. Justice Baker’s opinion in the present case.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3880939. Public record. Not legal advice.