# Hall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · November 21, 1946 · 160 Pa. Super. 65

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3860009

## Case

- **Full name:** Hall Unemployment Compensation Case. Hall, Appellant, v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** November 21, 1946
- **Citations:** 160 Pa. Super. 65; 49 A.2d 872; 1946 Pa. Super. LEXIS 473
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** Bald, Rhodes, Hirt, Reno, Dithrich, Ross, Arnold
- **Cited by:** 12 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3860009

## Opinion text

Per Curiam,
The board adopted the referee’s findings of fact which established that claimant-appellant, with a service rating of thirty-four years as an employe of the Bell Telephone Company, elected to be, and was, retired on a pension of |30.00 per month, although she was only 55 years old and might have retained her position until she became 65 years old. The testimony was oral and conflicting, and the unemployment compensation authori
*66
ties resolved the question of credibility against claimant. The findings of fact are supported by the evidence, and they are binding upon us. Unemployment Compensation Law, §510, 43 PS §830. With the essential facts found against her, the contention that she was laid off cannot be sustained. She separated herself from her employment voluntarily. Id. §402 (b), 43 PS §802.
Decision affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3860009. Public record. Not legal advice.