# Rolling v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.

> Superior Court of Pennsylvania · March 6, 1939 · 136 Pa. Super. 153

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3856774

## Case

- **Full name:** Rolling, Appellant, v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Company
- **Court:** Superior Court of Pennsylvania
- **Decided:** March 6, 1939
- **Citations:** 136 Pa. Super. 153; 7 A.2d 135; 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 195
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Keller
- **Judges:** Baldrige, Cunningham, Keller, Parker, Rhodes, Stadteeld
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3856774

## Opinion text

Dissenting Opinion by
Keller, P. J. :
Judge Rhodes and I dissent, and are of the opinion that the judgment should have been reversed and the award of the board sustained.
In our view this case is distinguished from the Shoffier case, on which the majority opinion relies, by reason of the fact that in that case the employee brakeman at the time of the injury was not merely riding on the engine but
attempting to operate it.
It was this latter fact that took him out of his employment.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3856774. Public record. Not legal advice.