# Krebs v. Perry

> Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 1930 · 134 Or. 290

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3841466

## Case

- **Full name:** KREBS Et Al. v. PERRY Et Al.; And HYND BROS. CO. v. PERRY Et Al.
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** May 5, 1930
- **Citations:** 134 Or. 290; 293 P. 432; 292 P. 319; 1930 Ore. LEXIS 31
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum by Rand
- **Judges:** Rand
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3841466

## Opinion text

Petition for rehearing denied November 25, 1930
On Petition eor Rehearing .
( 293 P. 432 )
RAND, J.
By their petitions for rehearing, the respective appellants in the foregoing cases have called our attention to the fact that there are certain provisions in the decrees appealed from which are inconsistent with the opinion and that, therefore, the affirmance of the decrees was erroneous upon our part.
An examination of the record shows that the point is well taken. For these reasons, the order affirming the decrees will be set aside and the causes will be remanded to the court below for the entry of new decrees in accordance with the decision rendered, but without costs to any of the parties upon the appeal. In all other respects, the former opinion will be adhered to.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3841466. Public record. Not legal advice.