# Wakefield, Fries & Co. v. Sherman, Clay & Co.

> Oregon Supreme Court · September 27, 1932 · 141 Or. 270

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3841127

## Case

- **Full name:** Wakefield, Fries & Co. v. Sherman, Clay & Co.
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 27, 1932
- **Citations:** 141 Or. 270; 17 P.2d 319; 1932 Ore. LEXIS 228
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Belt
- **Judges:** Rand, Belt, Bossman
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3841127

## Opinion text

BELT, J.,
concurring in part:
I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Band excepting that part thereof relative to reduction in the amount of the judgment.
There is substantial testimony to the effect that the services rendered were reasonably worth $4,500. Witnesses Staver, Guild, and Clausen so testified. The finding of the court in an action at law is equivalent to the verdict of the jury. It is not for this court to pass upon the weight of the evidence. The judgment, in my opinion, should be affirmed and not modified.
Bossman, J., concurs.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3841127. Public record. Not legal advice.