# State Ex Rel. Joseph v. Mannix

> Oregon Supreme Court · September 4, 1930 · 133 Or. 329

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3839172

## Case

- **Full name:** State Ex Rel. Joseph v. Mannix
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** September 4, 1930
- **Citations:** 133 Or. 329; 290 P. 745; 288 P. 507; 1930 Ore. LEXIS 94
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Addendum
- **Judges:** Bean, Belt, Brown, Coshow, McBride, Rand, Rossman
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3839172

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that the stat- ute of limitations governing criminal prosecutions is not a defense to a proceeding for suspension or disbarment of a lawyer

## Opinion text

I adhere to the former opinion that the attorney be suspended from practicing for a period of one year. *Page 388

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3839172. Public record. Not legal advice.