# State v. McDaniel

> Oregon Supreme Court · October 3, 1924 · 115 Or. 187

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3838115

## Case

- **Full name:** State v. F.A. McDaniel.
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 3, 1924
- **Citations:** 115 Or. 187; 237 P. 373; 231 P. 965; 1925 Ore. LEXIS 59
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Brown
- **Judges:** Pipes, Belt, Bean, Rand, Brown, McBride, Burnett, Coshow, Band
- **Cited by:** 49 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3838115

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- discussing constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures as rooted in common law protection for sanctity of home

## Opinion text

*244
BROWN, J.,
Dissenting in Part, Concurring in Part.—In the main I am in accord with the law as laid down by Mr. Justice Belt in the well-prepared majority opinion, bnt I cannot concur in the holding that the defendant was lawfully arrested prior to the forcible search of his person, or that such search and subsequent arrest were contemporaneous.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3838115. Public record. Not legal advice.