# Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

> Oregon Supreme Court · October 28, 1946 · 180 Or. 133

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3837922

## Case

- **Full name:** Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
- **Court:** Oregon Supreme Court
- **Decided:** October 28, 1946
- **Citations:** 180 Or. 133; 175 P.2d 778; 1946 Ore. LEXIS 207
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** Bailey, Belt, Brand, Hay, Lusk
- **Cited by:** 35 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3837922

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- observing that policies favoring obligation to arbitrate and conclusiveness of arbitration might not apply where obligation to arbitrate was infected by fraud, overreaching, undue pressure, or similar conduct on a representative union’s part
- holding that limited grounds on which judicial review of arbitration decisions is available does not bar giving such decisions preclusive effect

## Opinion text

See 3 Am. Jur. 892 , 919; decisions of benefit society, conclusiveness, note, 51 A.L.R. 1420 ; see, also, notes 104 A.L.R. 567 , 110 A.L.R. 142 ; 39 C.J., Master and servant, § 15. *Page 135

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3837922. Public record. Not legal advice.