# State Ex Rel. Roth v. Waterfield

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · October 17, 1933 · 167 Okla. 209

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3836725

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE Ex Rel. ROTH, Trustee, v. WATERFIELD, Court Clerk
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** October 17, 1933
- **Citations:** 167 Okla. 209; 29 P.2d 24; 1933 OK 546; 1933 Okla. LEXIS 840
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Swindall
- **Judges:** AIc-XEILL, Andrews, Bayless, Busby, Cullison, McNEILL, Osborn, Riley, Swindall, Welch, Wind
- **Cited by:** 33 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3836725

## Opinion text

SWINDALL, J.
I concur in the rule of law announced in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 of the syllabus, and in that portion of the majority opinion holding sections 2, 3 and 4 of said act constitutional, and the holding that said cause should be reversed, and dissent from the construction placed on sections 2 and 3, and from the other portions of the majority opinion and concur in the views expressed in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice OSBORN relative to the construction of the act under consideration.
AIc-XEILL, J., concurs in the views of Justice SWINDALL.
WELCH, J., concurs in the law stated in the syllabus and in the conclusion.
OSBORN, J., dissents.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3836725. Public record. Not legal advice.