# State Ex Rel. Roth v. Waterfield

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · October 17, 1933 · 167 Okla. 209

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3836723

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE Ex Rel. ROTH, Trustee, v. WATERFIELD, Court Clerk
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** October 17, 1933
- **Citations:** 167 Okla. 209; 29 P.2d 24; 1933 OK 546; 1933 Okla. LEXIS 840
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Osborn
- **Judges:** AIc-XEILL, Andrews, Bayless, Busby, Cullison, McNEILL, Osborn, Riley, Swindall, Welch, Wind
- **Cited by:** 33 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3836723

## Opinion text

OSBORN, J.
(dissenting). In dissenting from the majority opinion on rehearing in the above cause, I call attention to my dissenting opinion filed October 17, 1933, in the companion case of State ex rel. Osage County Savings
&
Loan Ass’n v. Worten, District Judge, 167 Okla. 187 , 29 P. (2d) 1 , decided at the same time as the original decision in the above case, which dissenting opinion expresses my views on this important subject.
After carefully reading the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States delivered by Chief Justice Hughes in the case of Home Building
&
Loan Association v. Blaisdell et al., 54 S. Ct. 231 , 78 L. Ed. — (Minn.) 249 N. W. 334 , I remain of the opinion that when the entire act under consideration by this court is construed as set forth in my prior dissenting opinion, said act was violative of no provision of the state or federal Constitutions.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3836723. Public record. Not legal advice.