# Cunningham v. Oklahoma City

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · February 15, 1941 · 188 Okla. 466

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3836590

## Case

- **Full name:** CUNNINGHAM v. OKLAHOMA CITY Et Al.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** February 15, 1941
- **Citations:** 188 Okla. 466; 110 P.2d 1102; 1941 OK 56; 1941 Okla. LEXIS 38
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Riley
- **Judges:** Welch, Corn, Gibson, Hurst, Riley
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3836590

## Opinion text

RILEY, J.
I concur herein, expressing no opinion on the issue of the sale of the bonds involved, upon a chilled market, pending litigation concerning validity of the bonds. That question is not now before us, but judges cannot be blind to that which everyone knows, especially upon questions publici juris.
Everyone may know there is now a third action which may present the question not now before us. It may present an issue of law depending upon facts occurring subsequent to those of record by which we measured the issues in Henry v. City of Oklahoma City, 188 Okla. 308 , 108 P. 2d 148 , and by which we measure the cause this day determined.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3836590. Public record. Not legal advice.