# State Highway Commission v. Brixey

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · October 6, 1936 · 178 Okla. 118

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3832631

## Case

- **Full name:** STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. BRIXEY Et Al.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** October 6, 1936
- **Citations:** 178 Okla. 118; 61 P.2d 1114; 1936 OK 595; 1936 Okla. LEXIS 510
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Sullivan
- **Judges:** Welch, McNeill, Phelps, Corn, Busby, Riley, Bayless, Gibson, Sullivan, Osborn
- **Cited by:** 13 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3832631

## Opinion text

SULLIVAN, Special Justice
(dissenting). I dissent from the majority opinion and concur in the views expressed in the dissenting opinion filed by Mr. Justice RILEY, especially to the effect that the rule in the case of State Highway Commission v. Smith, 146 Okla. 244 , 293 P. 1002 , should govern herein, and that section 11931, O. S. 1931, prescribing procedure to be followed for recovery of loss of property taken or damaged by the State Highway Commission, gives the consent of the state to the particular form of action as instituted herein.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3832631. Public record. Not legal advice.