# St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · June 18, 1935 · 172 Okla. 607

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3817885

## Case

- **Full name:** St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Pontotoc County Excise Board.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** June 18, 1935
- **Citations:** 172 Okla. 607; 47 P.2d 177
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Welch
- **Judges:** Welch, McNeill, Busby, Phelps, Corn
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3817885

## Opinion text

WELCH, J.
The sole question here in
*608
volved has been determined by the court in Morley v. State ex rel. Board of Education, City of Tulsa, 171 Okla. 46 , 47 P. (2d) 170 , where it was held in paragraph 1 of the syllabus that:
“Under the provisions of chapter 85, Session Laws 1933, a surplus balance and net unincumbered ad valorem taxes in the process of collection within legal limitations, are available for appropriation in addition to the amount that may be raised by ad valorem taxation.”
See, also, Protest of St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 169 Okla. 64 , 38 P. (2d) 513 , to the same effect.
The judgment is affirmed.
McNEILL, O. J., and BUSBY, PHELPS, and CORN, JX, concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3817885. Public record. Not legal advice.