# Vandervort v. Keen

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · November 22, 1938 · 184 Okla. 121

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3815279

## Case

- **Full name:** VANDERVORT Et Al. v. KEEN, Dist. Judge
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** November 22, 1938
- **Citations:** 184 Okla. 121; 85 P.2d 405; 1938 OK 598; 1938 Okla. LEXIS 441
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Gibson
- **Judges:** Gibson, Osborn, Corn, Hurst, Davison
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3815279

## Opinion text

GIBSON, J.
This is an original proceeding by Dennis Vandervort and others for writ of prohibition against AV. P. Keen, district judge of Custer county, to arrest proceedings in an injunction suit brought in that court by the State Board of Barber Examiners against petitioners pursuant to article 2. chapter 24, S. L. 1937, known as the Barber Law.
The aforesaid statute is attacked as unconstitutional upon the same grounds as urged in the case of Herrin v. Arnold, 183 Okla. 392 , 82 P.2d 977 . The facts and circumstances here are in every respect analogous to those arising and presented in that case, and there all constitutional questions were resolved by the court against the contentions of the petitioner, and the writ denied. No additional questions are
*122
presented in the instant case. Therefore, the law as stated and applied in the Herrin Case is controlling- and is adopted here, and demands denial of the writ.
Writ denied.
OSBORN, C. J., and CORN, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3815279. Public record. Not legal advice.