# Fenton v. Young Chevrolet Co.

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · June 30, 1942 · 191 Okla. 161

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3815206

## Case

- **Full name:** Fenton v. Young Chevrolet Co.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** June 30, 1942
- **Citations:** 191 Okla. 161; 127 P.2d 813; 1942 OK 262; 1942 Okla. LEXIS 357
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Corn
- **Judges:** Osborn, Riley, Bayless, Gibson, Davison, Welch, Corn, Hurst, Arnold
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3815206

## Opinion text

CORN, V. C. J.
(dissenting). I am of the opinion that a replevin action brought for possession of chattels given to secure payment of a note is an attempt to collect the note, and House Bill No. 606 of the Seventeenth Legislature should be complied with. It is the means the state has adopted to compel persons holding debts to give in and pay taxes upon them. I feel it is the duty of the courts to enforce the act as a condition precedent.
The majority opinion makes it possible for the holder of the note to make collection thereof, without having to comply with said act.
I therefore dissent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3815206. Public record. Not legal advice.