# Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Okmulgee County Excise Board

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · October 20, 1942 · 191 Okla. 572

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3811899

## Case

- **Full name:** MID-CONTINENT PIPE LINE CO. Et Al. v. OKMULGEE COUNTY EXCISE BOARD
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** October 20, 1942
- **Citations:** 191 Okla. 572; 131 P.2d 753; 1942 OK 353; 1942 Okla. LEXIS 288
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Welch
- **Judges:** Welch, Osborn, Bayless, Davison, Arnold, Hurst, Gibson, Corn, Riley
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3811899

## Opinion text

WELCH, C. J.
This appeal involves protests based upon the contention that appropriations for school districts Nos. 8, 12, and 45 of Okmulgee county are excessive because total valuations in the district were not as great as the total assessed valuations employed by the excise board in calculating the rates of levy.
These are the same school districts from which parts of territory were taken by annexation as shown and discussed in case No. 30860, the Texas-Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa County, Excise Board, decided this date by this court, 191 Okla. 586 , 131 P. 2d 745 . That case and the present case are briefed as one on the issues herein. Our views and conclusion therein dispose of the question presented here.
Judgment affirmed.
OSBORN, BAYLESS, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur. HURST, J., concurs in result. GIBSON, J., dissents. CORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, J., absent.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3811899. Public record. Not legal advice.