# Caldwell v. State

> Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · May 9, 1931 · 50 Okla. Crim. 449

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3801836

## Case

- **Full name:** J. A. Caldwell v. State.
- **Court:** Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** May 9, 1931
- **Citations:** 50 Okla. Crim. 449; 299 P. 1083; 1931 OK CR 227; 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 202
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** PER CURIAM.
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3801836

## Opinion text

PER CURIAM.
An examination of the record discloses that the state offered no witness who claimed to have seen defendant with the whisky, or to having seen him transport it, nor does the evidence of the state show any definite evidence of the whisky being transported from one place to another.
*450
Under the rule announced in Smith v. State, 34 Okla. Cr. 293 , 246 Pac. 261 ; Brown v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 509 , 196 Pac. 967 ; Aycock v. State, 32 Okla. Cr. 302 , 240 Pac. 1081 ; Jones v. State, 39 Okla. Cr. 195 , 264 Pac. 638 ; and Slayton v. State, 45 Okla. Cr. 283 , 283 Pac. 258 — the evidence of the state was wholly insufficient to support the verdict of the jury.
For the reasons stated, the cause is reversed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3801836. Public record. Not legal advice.