# Young v. Boswell

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · December 15, 1942 · 191 Okla. 680

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3800856

## Case

- **Full name:** YOUNG, Trustee, v. BOSWELL Et Al.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** December 15, 1942
- **Citations:** 191 Okla. 680; 134 P.2d 592; 1942 OK 429; 1942 Okla. LEXIS 318
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Hurst
- **Judges:** Davison, Riley, Osborn, Gibson, Arnold, Welch, Corn, Hurst
- **Cited by:** 12 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3800856

## Opinion text

HURST, J.
(dissenting). It is my opinion that the very purpose of the curative provision of 68 O. S. 1941 §§ 452, 453, was to prevent the courts from invalidating tax titles for such trivial errors and irregularities as the one involved in the present case. My views are stated in Welborn v. Whitney, 190 Okla. 630 , 126 P. 2d 263 , and need not be repeated here. For the reasons there stated, I dissent to the majority opinion.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3800856. Public record. Not legal advice.