# Russell Petroleum Co. v. Walker

> Supreme Court of Oklahoma · February 7, 1933 · 162 Okla. 216

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3797612

## Case

- **Full name:** RUSSELL PETROLEUM CO. v. WALKER Et Al.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of Oklahoma
- **Decided:** February 7, 1933
- **Citations:** 162 Okla. 216; 19 P.2d 582; 1933 OK 75; 1933 Okla. LEXIS 564
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Welch
- **Judges:** Andrews, Busby, Riley, Cullison, Bayless, Welch, Swindall, Osborn, McNeill
- **Cited by:** 16 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3797612

## Opinion text

WELCH, J.
I concur w-itli the majority opinion.
If the plaintiff, Russell Petroleum Company, admits the inequitable taking of oil, or admits it is violating the proration laws of Oklahoma, then I concur with that part of the special concurring- opinion of Mr. Justice BUSBY as to the requirement that the plaintiff must pulrge himself, and must do equity along- with his request that equity grant him relief from the acts of others.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3797612. Public record. Not legal advice.