# Opinion No. 52-0920

> Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · September 20, 1952

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3790719

## Case

- **Full name:** Jack v. Boyd Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board
- **Court:** Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
- **Decided:** September 20, 1952
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3790719

## Opinion text

OPINION — AG — ** BUILDING — BONDS ** THUS, IF THE USE TO WHICH THE OKLAHOMA PLANNING AND RESOURCES BOARD PROPOSES TO PUT SAID FRAME BUILDING BRINGS IT WITHIN THE CLASSIFICATION OF FACILITIES "WHICH CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED FROM REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS" (UNDER THE RULE SET OUT IN SECT. 4 OF THE BILL), WE BELIEVE SAID APPROPRIATION MAY BE USED TO PURCHASE SAME. WHETHER OR NOT SAID BUILDING COMES WITHIN SAID CLASSIFICATION IS A QUESTION OF FACT. THE BOARD WOULD HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO BUY SAID BUILDING UNLESS THE OWNER THEREOF FURNISHED CLEAR TITLE THERETO. (PURCHASE) CITE: 74 O.S. 351 [ 74-351 ] (MAINARD KENNERLY)

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3790719. Public record. Not legal advice.