# Micro Lapping & Grinding Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

> Ohio Court of Appeals · November 26, 1984 · 20 Ohio App. 3d 356

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3768761

## Case

- **Full name:** Micro Lapping & Grinding Company, Appellee, v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Appellant, Et Al.
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** November 26, 1984
- **Citations:** 20 Ohio App. 3d 356; 20 Ohio B. 460; 486 N.E.2d 225; 1984 Ohio App. LEXIS 12618
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Nahra
- **Judges:** Parrino, Russo, Nahra
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3768761

## Opinion text

*359
Nahra, J.,
dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Appellee had until midnight on January 20 to file its appeal, which included having it postmarked before that time. Neither the statute nor the administrative code require a post office postmark, and I would not read this added provision into the statute. Certainly private meter marks may be manipulated, but in this case there is no question the notice of appeal was mailed before the January 20 deadline since it was received by the board of review on January 21.1 would affirm the judgment of the trial court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3768761. Public record. Not legal advice.