# State v. Barker

> Ohio Court of Appeals · June 5, 1998 · 128 Ohio App. 3d 233

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3768477

## Case

- **Full name:** The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. BARKER, Appellant
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** June 5, 1998
- **Citations:** 128 Ohio App. 3d 233; 714 N.E.2d 447
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Sherck
- **Judges:** Handwork, Knepper, Sherck
- **Cited by:** 14 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3768477

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- finding that defendant could be required to give up all animals in her possession as a condition of probation and not merely those particular animals with respect to which she had been convicted of cruelty; condition was reasonably related to defendant's rehabilitation, had re…

## Opinion text

Sherck, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I concur with the majority’s handling of appellant’s assignments of error two through nine. I, however, dissent as to appellant’s resisting-arrest conviction. I do not believe that appellant’s passive resistance constituted recklessness or force sufficient to convict her of this offense.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3768477. Public record. Not legal advice.