# Shaper v. Tracy

> Ohio Court of Appeals · September 29, 1994 · 97 Ohio App. 3d 760

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3766859

## Case

- **Full name:** SHAPER, Appellant, v. TRACY, Tax Commr, Et Al., Appellees
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** September 29, 1994
- **Citations:** 97 Ohio App. 3d 760; 647 N.E.2d 550; 1994 Ohio App. LEXIS 4358
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bryant
- **Judges:** Young, Bryant, Mahoney, Ninth
- **Cited by:** 6 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3766859

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- discussing Bonaparte's holding and noting that it was not based on the Commerce Clause

## Opinion text

Peggy Bryant, Judge,
concurring.
Concurring in the majority’s analysis of appellant’s contentions under the Commerce Clause, and the majority’s determination that its conclusion under the Commerce Clause renders her arguments under Section 1983, Title 42, U.S.Code moot, I thus concur in the majority’s holding that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3766859. Public record. Not legal advice.