# State v. Schmoll

> Ohio Court of Appeals · October 7, 2005 · 163 Ohio App. 3d 677

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3763083

## Case

- **Full name:** The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. SCHMOLL, Appellant
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** October 7, 2005
- **Citations:** 163 Ohio App. 3d 677; 2005 Ohio 5379; 839 N.E.2d 995
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Hoffman
- **Judges:** Farmer, Gwin, Hoffman
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3763083

## Opinion text

Hoffman, Judge,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
{¶ 73} I concur in the majority’s analysis and disposition of appellant’s first, second, third, and fifth assignments of error.
{¶ 74} I respectfully dissent from the majority’s analysis and disposition of appellant’s fourth assignment of error for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in
State v. Hughett
(Nov. 18, 2004), Delaware App. No. 04-CA-06051, 2004-Ohio-6207 , 2004 WL 2648784 .

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3763083. Public record. Not legal advice.