# Hitchcock v. Akron City Schools Board of Education, 23632 (6-4-2008)

> Ohio Court of Appeals · June 4, 2008 · 2008 Ohio 2668

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3745895

## Case

- **Full name:** Jaqueal Hitchcock v. Akron City Schools Board of Education
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** June 4, 2008
- **Citations:** 2008 Ohio 2668
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** PER CURIAM.
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3745895

## Opinion text

{¶ 14} I respectfully dissent. I would find that the trial court erred in failing to grant Lindsay judgment on the pleadings. Appellees' complaint states that Lindsay was at all times employed by the School System and the trial court properly found that the School System was immune. This means that Lindsay should also be immune absent detailed allegations in the complaint that demonstrate one of the three exceptions to immunity set forth in R.C. 2744.03 (A)(6) apply. The bare allegations of the complaint *Page 7
are too vague and ambiguous and do not establish any set of facts that would entitle Appellees to relief.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3745895. Public record. Not legal advice.