# State v. Brown, C-080320 (4-24-2009)

> Ohio Court of Appeals · April 24, 2009 · 2009 Ohio 1889

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3734450

## Case

- **Full name:** State of Ohio v. James Brown
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** April 24, 2009
- **Citations:** 2009 Ohio 1889
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** HILDEBRANDT, Judge.
- **Cited by:** 2 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3734450

## Opinion text

{¶ 30} After oral argument in this case, the Ohio Supreme Court released State v. Winn , holding unequivocally that robbery and kidnapping are allied offenses. 20 I assumed that would have settled this case. But no. We now learn the fine distinction that if you point a gun a few seconds after you have pocketed the money, then that is a separate animus. Phooey.
20 State v. Winn , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2009-Ohio-1059 , ___ N.E.2d ___. *Page 1

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3734450. Public record. Not legal advice.