# State v. Dean

> Ohio Court of Appeals · January 12, 2007 · 170 Ohio App. 3d 292

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3730089

## Case

- **Full name:** The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. DEAN, Appellant
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** January 12, 2007
- **Citations:** 170 Ohio App. 3d 292; 2007 Ohio 91; 866 N.E.2d 1134
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Painter
- **Judges:** Hendon, Winkler, Painter
- **Cited by:** 1 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3730089

## Opinion text

Painter, Presiding Judge,
concurring.
{¶ 55} So now we have an ordinance regulating soliciting
without
a registration requirement. Surely that sloppy drafting can be fixed. I concur in Judge Hendon’s excellent analysis.
Ralph Winkler, J., retired, of the First Appellate District, sitting by assignment.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3730089. Public record. Not legal advice.