# In Re Removal of Sites

> Ohio Court of Appeals · December 22, 2006 · 170 Ohio App. 3d 272

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3729964

## Case

- **Full name:** In Re REMOVAL OF SITES Et Al.
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** December 22, 2006
- **Citations:** 170 Ohio App. 3d 272; 2006 Ohio 6996; 866 N.E.2d 1119
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Harsha
- **Judges:** Abele, Kline, Harsha
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3729964

## Opinion text

Harsha, Presiding Judge,
dissenting.
{¶ 35} Upon consideration of the briefs, it appears that the appeal does not present us with a question of law as required by R.C. 3.09. Thus, I would not address the merits but rather would dismiss the appeal as having been improvidently granted.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3729964. Public record. Not legal advice.