# Cameron v. Ohio Department of Transportation

> Ohio Court of Appeals · December 22, 1995 · 108 Ohio App. 3d 20

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3729073

## Case

- **Full name:** CAMERON, Appellant, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** December 22, 1995
- **Citations:** 108 Ohio App. 3d 20; 669 N.E.2d 874
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Glasser
- **Judges:** Resnick, Sherck, Glasser
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3729073

## Opinion text

Glasser, Judge,
dissenting.
I must respectfully dissent from the holding of the majority. The issue before this court in this administrative appeal is whether the common pleas court abused its discretion in concluding that the determination of the board was supported by rehable, probative and substantial evidence and was in accordance with law. In my view, the record in this matter supports the board’s decision. Moreover, by finding that the board’s decision was not in accordance with law, the majority has weighed the evidence and reached a conclusion different from that of the board. It is not within our province to reach different conclusions on factual issues. Accordingly, I would affirm the judgment of the common pleas court.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3729073. Public record. Not legal advice.