# Ggj, Inc v. Tuscarawas Cty. Bd. of Commrs., Unpublished Decision (5-16-2006)

> Ohio Court of Appeals · May 16, 2006 · 2006 Ohio 2527

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3718758

## Case

- **Full name:** Ggj, Inc. v. Tuscarawas County Board of Commissioners
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** May 16, 2006
- **Citations:** 2006 Ohio 2527
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Concurrence
- **Judges:** JOHN W. WISE

William B. Hoffman

Sheila G. Farmer
- **Cited by:** 9 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3718758

## Opinion text

{¶ 20} I concur in the majority's analysis and disposition of appellant's assignment of error. I write separately only to note it appears the promise made by appellee Board, upon which appellant claims to have detrimentally relied, was kept. The Board agreed to act as guarantor on the bond. The Board did just that. The fact the vote was not unanimous does not equate to breaking that promise. The Board acts collectively, not individually. The fact an underwriting investment entity subsequently deemed the bonds unmarketable because the Board resolution was not unanimous does not constitute a breach of promise by the Board.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3718758. Public record. Not legal advice.