# Haley v. Ohio State Dental Board

> Ohio Court of Appeals · March 24, 1982 · 7 Ohio App. 3d 1

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3710425

## Case

- **Full name:** Haley, Appellant, v. Ohio State Dental Board, Appellee
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** March 24, 1982
- **Citations:** 7 Ohio App. 3d 1; 7 Ohio B. 1; 453 N.E.2d 1262; 1982 Ohio App. LEXIS 11090
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Wilson
- **Judges:** Brogan, Kerns, Wilson
- **Cited by:** 42 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3710425

## How later opinions describe it (automated extraction)

- holding that while administrative agencies are not bound by strict rules of evidence, they "should not act upon evidence which is not admissible, competent, or probative of the facts which it is to determine"
- finding that, although hearsay evidence was not properly authenticated by custodian, the board could still consider the evidence

## Opinion text

Wilson, J.,
dissenting. In my view, Assignment of Error No. 2 should be overruled.
The appellant’s conduct may be viola-tive of a rule of the State Dental Board or “of any laws pertaining to the practice of dentistry or dental hygiene,” R.C. 4715.30, or be guilty of “grossly immoral conduct.”
There being some evidence that the appellant would not treat the patient unless the patient signed a release of liability, I do not think the trial court’s finding was against the manifest weight of the evidence.
I would affirm.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3710425. Public record. Not legal advice.