# Manning v. City of Avon Lake, 06ca008958 (3-10-2008)

> Ohio Court of Appeals · March 10, 2008 · 2008 Ohio 1000

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3706058

## Case

- **Full name:** Virginia Manning v. City of Avon Lake
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** March 10, 2008
- **Citations:** 2008 Ohio 1000
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** DICKINSON, Judge.
- **Cited by:** 3 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3706058

## Opinion text

{¶ 29} I respectfully dissent on the basis of stare decisis. I find this case analogous to our prior decision in Jenks v. Barberton , 9th Dist. No. 22300, 2005-Ohio-995 , in which we found the condition of the sidewalk to be an open and obvious danger and that the city's notice of the conditions was irrelevant. Accordingly, I dissent. *Page 1

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3706058. Public record. Not legal advice.