# State v. Henry, 2006-Ca-00245 (10-24-2007)

> Ohio Court of Appeals · October 24, 2007 · 2007 Ohio 5702

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3699391

## Case

- **Full name:** State of Ohio v. Markus Quantez Henry
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** October 24, 2007
- **Citations:** 2007 Ohio 5702
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent
- **Judges:** EDWARDS, J.
- **Cited by:** 4 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3699391

## Opinion text

{¶ 37} While I dissent from the majority's disposition of this case, I fully concur in its analysis. However, I believe the disposition which results from the analysis should be to vacate the trial court's judgment and remand the case, rather than to affirm and remand. Upon remand, if Appellant's sentence had not expired prior to July 17, 2006, the trial court would then re-enter sentence.
HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN
*Page 1

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3699391. Public record. Not legal advice.