# Chirila v. Ohio State Chiropractic Board

> Ohio Court of Appeals · August 2, 2001 · 145 Ohio App. 3d 589

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3688780

## Case

- **Full name:** Mark R. Chirila, D.C., Appellant-Appellant v. Ohio State Chiropractic Board, Appellee-Appellee.
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** August 2, 2001
- **Citations:** 145 Ohio App. 3d 589; 763 N.E.2d 1192; 2001 Ohio App. LEXIS 3386
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Concurrence by Bryant
- **Judges:** Kennedy, Brown, Bryant
- **Cited by:** 29 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3688780

## Opinion text

Peggy Bryant, Presiding Judge,
concurring.
I concur in the majority’s conclusion that appellant’s second assignment of error be sustained.
Appellee’s concerns about imposing obligations on it to “research all of the corresponding cases” and so advise appellant may have merit in other stages of the proceedings. They are, however, unpersuasive here, where the notice is
*598
designed to, and must be sufficient to, “enable the recipient to determine what he must do to prevent the deprivation of his interest.”
Estate of Wolff v. Weston Town Bd.
(1990), 156 Wis.2d 588 , 457 N.W.2d 510, 513 , citing
Goldberg v. Kelly
(1970), 397 U.S. 254, 267-268 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 . Although appellant’s retaining legal counsel may have assisted his interpreting the notice, which was premised on the language of the statute, appellant was not required to obtain counsel to interpret the notice that advised him of what he must do to engage in the hearing process before the board. Because the notice was insufficient to accomplish its purpose, I concur in the majority’s sustaining the second assignment of error. I further concur in its resolution of the first and third assignments of error.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3688780. Public record. Not legal advice.