# Hebeler v. Colerain Twp. Board, Zoning App., Unpublished Decision (4-5-2000)

> Ohio Court of Appeals · April 5, 2000

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3684924

## Case

- **Full name:** Stephen Hebeler, Regina Hebeler, Alan Schell, Susan Schell, Lillian Lanphier and Peter Lanphier v. Colerain Township Board of Zoning Appeals, Colerain Athletic Association and Colerain Township Board of Township Trustees
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** April 5, 2000
- **Precedential status:** Unpublished
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court
- **Judges:** DOAN, PRESIDING JUDGE.
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3684924

## Opinion text

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] JUDGMENT ENTRY.
This appeal, considered on the accelerated calendar under App.R. 11.1(E) and Loc.R. 12, is not controlling authority except as provided in S.Ct.R.Rep.Op. 2(G)(1).
The trial court properly considered the factors set forth in Duncan v. Middlefield (1986), 23 Ohio St.3d 83 , 491 N.E.2d 692 , as we directed it to do on remand from the previous appeal. See Hebeler v. Colerain Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals
(1997), 116 Ohio App.3d 182 , 687 N.E.2d 324 . Our review of the record shows that its judgment, holding that the Colerain Athletic Association had met the "practical difficulties" test for an area variance, and that the decision of the Colerain Township Board of Zoning Appeals was supported by a preponderance of substantial, reliable, and probative evidence, was not an abuse of discretion. See Duncan, supra ; Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30 , 465 N.E.2d 848 ; Cash v. Cincinnati Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1996), 117 Ohio App.3d 319 , 690 N.E.2d 593 . Accordingly, we overrule appellants' sole assignment of error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Further, a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate, which shall be sent to the trial court under App.R. 27. Costs shall be taxed under App.R. 24.
Doan, P.J., Gorman and Painter, JJ.
To the Clerk:
Enter upon the Journal of the Court on April 5, 2000
per order of the Court.
_________________ PRESIDING JUDGE DOAN

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3684924. Public record. Not legal advice.