# Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

> Ohio Court of Appeals · June 13, 1990 · 66 Ohio App. 3d 826

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3684566

## Case

- **Full name:** Parenti v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Company, [Fn]
- **Court:** Ohio Court of Appeals
- **Decided:** June 13, 1990
- **Citations:** 66 Ohio App. 3d 826; 4 Ohio App. Unrep. 352; 586 N.E.2d 1121; 1990 Ohio App. LEXIS 2373
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Dissent by Quillin
- **Judges:** Reece, Quillin, Baird
- **Cited by:** 275 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3684566

## Opinion text

QUILLIN, J.,
concurs in part and dissents in part.
I agree that R.C. 4123.56 applies even though the injury pre-dated the statute I also agree that
Balyint
v.
Arkansas Best Freight Systems, Inc.
(1985), 18 Ohio St. 3d 126 applies. I disagree with the majority's application of
Balyint .
When the six separate opinions in
Balyint
are ready together,
Balyint
stands for the proposition that when a self-insurer intentionally and wrongfully terminates worker's compensation payments, the employee may have a bad faith claim under the rationale of
Hoskins
v.
Aetna Life Ins.
Co.(1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 272 .
That being so, summary judgment in favor of Goodyear was correct as to the first and third causes of action but incorrect as to the second cause of action.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3684566. Public record. Not legal advice.