# Theiling v. . Wilson

> Supreme Court of North Carolina · January 4, 1933 · 203 N.C. 809

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3679277

## Case

- **Full name:** R. H. THEILING v. GEORGE B. WILSON Et Al.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of North Carolina
- **Decided:** January 4, 1933
- **Citations:** 203 N.C. 809; 167 S.E. 32; 1933 N.C. LEXIS 431
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Stacy
- **Judges:** Stacy
- **Cited by:** 0 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3679277

## Opinion text

Stacy, C. J.
No cause of action is stated against the board of commissioners of Mecklenburg County. The plaintiff simply alleges that his employer is indebted to him and that the board of county commissioners is indebted to his employer. The demurrer was properly sustained.
Aman v. Walker,
165 N. C., 224 , 81 S. E., 162 .
But for a different reason, the appeal must be dismissed. Plaintiff has failed to file printed or mimeographed copies of brief as required by Rule 27. To dispense with the rule in this case would require its abrogation. Pr
uit v. Wood,
199 N. C., 788 , 156 S. E., 126 ;
Byrd v. Southerland,
186 N. C., 384 , 119 S. E., 2 .
Appeal dismissed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3679277. Public record. Not legal advice.