# Hyder v. Board of County Road Trustees for Henderson County

> Supreme Court of North Carolina · December 9, 1925 · 190 N.C. 663

URL: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3664366

## Case

- **Full name:** M. S. HYDER v. BOARD OF COUNTY ROAD TRUSTEES FOR HENDERSON COUNTY Et Al.
- **Court:** Supreme Court of North Carolina
- **Decided:** December 9, 1925
- **Citations:** 190 N.C. 663; 130 S.E. 497; 1925 N.C. LEXIS 146
- **Precedential status:** Published
- **Opinion:** Opinion of the court by Stacy
- **Judges:** Stacy
- **Cited by:** 5 later opinions in the Frix Law Library

## Citator (automated)

- No negative treatment found by the automated citator. That is not the same as a confirmation that the case is good law; read the citing cases.
- Full citator and citing cases: https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3664366

## Opinion text

*664
Stacy, C. J.,
after stating the case: The judgment sustaining the demurrers must be affirmed on authority of
Jenkins v. Griffith,
189 N. C., 633 , and
Hipp v. Fenrall,
173 N. C., 167 .
Jenkins v. Griffith
was written under a
per curiam
opinion, but this in no way impairs its force as a precedent. It is supported by full citation of authorities. Ordinarily, a
per curiam
is the opinion of the Court in a case in which we are all of one mind, and where the questions presented are controlled by previous decisions, or otherwise they are of such a nature that we do not deem it necessary, or beneficial to the profession, to elaborate them by an extended discussion.
Clarke v. Assurance Co.,
146 Pa. St., 561;
Minor v. Fike,
77 Kan., 806 , 93 Pac., 264 .
Affirmed.

---

Source: Frix Law Library, https://www.frixlaw.com/law-library/cases/3664366. Public record. Not legal advice.